News Archive (1999-2012) | 2013-current at LinuxGizmos | Current Tech News Portal |    About   

LinuxTag to SCO: desist from unfair competitive practices

May 26, 2003 — by LinuxDevices Staff — from the LinuxDevices Archive — views

LinuxTag, the organization behind Europe's largest annual convention for Free Software focusing on GNU/Linux, has served notice on SCO Group that their threats against Linux are not without liability to SCO. Among other things, LinuxTag's lawyers point out that by distributing Linux a distribution which SCO Group claims contains SCO proprietary software, it has thereby released its code under the GNU… General Public License (GPL) and thus has no basis to claim copyright infringement when others distribute that code thereafter.

LinuxTag issued the following press release on May 23, 2003 . .


LinuxTag has given notice to SCO Group GmbH to desist from unfair competitive practices

Lawyers representing the LinuxTag association have given notice to SCO Group GmbH to desist from unfair competitive practiices. The notice, dated Friday, May 23, maintains that SCO Group is sowing uncertainty among the community of GNU/Linux users, developers and suppliers. “SCO needs to stop claiming that the standard Linux kernel violates its copyrights, or they need to lay the evidence for their claim on the table,” said LinuxTag's Michael Kleinhenz.

The association demanded that the German SCO subsidiary retract its claims regarding ownership of Linux kernel code by this Friday, May 30, or make its evidence public. “SCO must not be allowed to damage its competitors by unsubstantiated claims, to intimidate their customers, and to inflict lasting damage on the reputation of GNU/Linux as an open platform,” Kleinhenz added.

Until a few weeks ago, SCO itself distributed the Linux kernel GNU General Public License (GPL) as a member of the UnitedLinux alliance. Thus even if SCO owns parts of the Linux kernel, it has made them into Free Software by distributing them under the GPL.

“This situation illustrates the superiority of the Free Software licensing model: If a software manufacturer withdraws from the development of GPL software, its contributions that were published under the the GPL up to that time remain available to users,” said Jürgen Siepmann, attorney and founding member of LinuxTag. Till Jaeger, Director of the Institute for Legal Aspects of Free and Open Source Software, agrees: “Companies see this as an important pillar of investment security.”


 
This article was originally published on LinuxDevices.com and has been donated to the open source community by QuinStreet Inc. Please visit LinuxToday.com for up-to-date news and articles about Linux and open source.



Comments are closed.