Thin clients save energy, spare CO2
May 17, 2007 — by LinuxDevices Staff — from the LinuxDevices Archive — views
Using thin clients instead of conventional PCs would lower energy consumption by 51 percent and reduce CO2 emissions, concludes a recent study by the Fraunhofer Institute. The study, whose results were announced today by Igel Technology, compared thin clients manufactured by Igel to conventional business PCs.
(Click for larger view of the Igel “Smart” thin client)
digg this story |
Thin clients represent “super slimmed down” alternatives to desktop PCs. Accessing information stored remotely on a server, the devices generally have no moving parts and little memory while delivering the essential application capabilities of a PC to their users. Due to the centralized architecture, an array of thin clients uses less power — and is considered by some to be more reliable and easier to manage — than an equal number of conventional PCs.
Thin clients have been promoted for years, but have been slow to catch on. Many thin clients run embedded operating systems, such as Linux, and Microsoft's Windows XP Embedded or Windows CE. Perhaps with the “green revolution” thin clients may see more respect.
Commenting on the Institute's report, Fraunhofer researcher Dr. Hartmut Pflaum stated, “While PCs consume about 85 watts on average, thin clients including their server and data room cooling get by with only 40 to 50 watts. In view of climate change and the need to reduce CO2 emissions, this is an important factor.”
Based on Fraunhofer's data (see tables below), Igel suggests — given an estimated 22.9 million business desktop PCs in operation in the U.S. — that thin clients could save U.S. businesses around $354.7 million a year, and could cut CO2 emission by about 2.45 billion pounds.
According to Igel's strategic director of worldwide marketing, Stephen Yeo, “The financial savings are significant but the impact on cutting CO2 emissions is what's really impressive. Saving 2.45 billion pounds of CO2 emissions would remove the equivalent impact of 106,521 average U.S. households each year.” Adding to this an estimated typical 25 percent TCO (total cost of ownership) savings of a thin client versus a PC, Yeo says, “there can be no doubt that server-based computing is the economic and eco-friendly way forward.”
Fraunhofer's findings
The Fraunhofer Institute's findings, as provided by Igel, appear in the following two tables. They compare the energy requirements and “CO2 wastage” of the two desktop computing architectures — thin clients, and PCs.
| Thin Client | Thin Client with server pro rata + server cooling 3 | PC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power consumption 1 | 16 W | 41 W | 85 W |
| x 8 hours per day | 128 Wh | 328 Wh | 680 Wh |
| x 220 working days per year | 28 kWh | 72 kWh | 149 kWh |
| Costs for 1 working station per year 2 | $5.67 | $14.54 | $30.03 |
| – 10 working stations | $56.70 | $145.40 | $300.30 |
| – 100 working stations | $567.00 | $1,454.00 | $3,003.00 |
| – 1,000 working stations | $5,670.00 | $14,540.00 | $30,030.00 |
| Savings TC compared to PC | 81% | 51% | |
|
|||
Table 2 — CO2 Wastage with Server Share
| Thin Client | Thin Client with server pro rata + server cooling 3 | PC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Power consumption 1 | 16 W | 41 W | 85 W |
| x 8 hours per day | 128 Wh | 328 Wh | 680 Wh |
| x 220 working days per year | 28 kWh | 72 kWh | 149 kWh |
| CO2 resulting from 1 working station per year 2 | 38.89 lbs | 100.00 lbs | 206.95 lbs |
| – 10 working stations | 388.90 lbs | 1,000.00 lbs | 2,069.50 lbs |
| – 100 working stations | 3,889.00 lbs | 10,000.00 lbs | 20,695.00 lbs |
| – 1,000 working stations | 38,890.00 lbs | 100,000.00 lbs | 206,950.00 lbs |
|
|||
More about thin clients
To learn about the broad spectrum of thin client devices powered by Linux, visit our “Linux Thin Client Showcase.”
This article was originally published on LinuxDevices.com and has been donated to the open source community by QuinStreet Inc. Please visit LinuxToday.com for up-to-date news and articles about Linux and open source.